Guyana vs Tajikistan: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Guyana
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 195.93 1000 USD against 160.66 1000 USD in Tajikistan, a difference of 35.27 1000 USD.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.2 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 124th and Tajikistan ranks 126th of 190 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,502 1000 USD | 1.27 1000 USD | 2,501 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 2,289 1000 USD | 508.33 1000 USD | 1,781 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2020s | 695.78 1000 USD | 290.53 1000 USD | 405.24 1000 USD | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Guyana or Tajikistan?
- Guyana, at 195.93 1000 USD against 160.66 1000 USD in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Guyana and Tajikistan?
- 35.27 1000 USD, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Tajikistan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Tajikistan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Guyana ranks 124th and Tajikistan ranks 126th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf