Iceland vs Kyrgyzstan: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Iceland
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 340.83 1000 USD against 331.7 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 9.13 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 114th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 115th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.29 1000 USD | 39.03 1000 USD | 17.26 1000 USD | Iceland |
| 2010s | 11.53 1000 USD | 201.65 1000 USD | 190.12 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 496.9 1000 USD | 235.76 1000 USD | 261.14 1000 USD | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Iceland or Kyrgyzstan?
- Iceland, at 340.83 1000 USD against 331.7 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Iceland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9.13 1000 USD, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kyrgyzstan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Iceland ranks 114th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 115th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf