Iceland vs Slovenia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Iceland
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 375.24 1000 USD against 340.83 1000 USD in Iceland, a difference of 34.41 1000 USD.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 114th and Slovenia ranks 111th of 190 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.29 1000 USD | 140.71 1000 USD | 84.42 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 11.53 1000 USD | 377.08 1000 USD | 365.55 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 496.9 1000 USD | 2,244 1000 USD | 1,747 1000 USD | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Iceland or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 375.24 1000 USD against 340.83 1000 USD in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Iceland and Slovenia?
- 34.41 1000 USD, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Slovenia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Slovenia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Iceland ranks 114th and Slovenia ranks 111th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf