Jamaica vs Tunisia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Jamaica
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 1,574 1000 USD against 1,284 1000 USD in Jamaica, a difference of 290 1000 USD.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 82nd of 177 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,487 1000 USD | 801.95 1000 USD | 1,685 1000 USD | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 1,935 1000 USD | 1,080 1000 USD | 855.39 1000 USD | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 2,158 1000 USD | 1,875 1000 USD | 282.83 1000 USD | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Jamaica or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 1,574 1000 USD against 1,284 1000 USD in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Jamaica and Tunisia?
- 290 1000 USD, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Tunisia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Tunisia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Jamaica ranks 85th and Tunisia ranks 82nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf