Jamaica vs Uganda: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Jamaica
- Uganda
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 1,284 1000 USD against 922.11 1000 USD in Uganda, a difference of 361.89 1000 USD.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.4 times Uganda's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 85th and Uganda ranks 88th of 177 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,487 1000 USD | 111.46 1000 USD | 2,376 1000 USD | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 1,935 1000 USD | 340.99 1000 USD | 1,594 1000 USD | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 2,158 1000 USD | 487.88 1000 USD | 1,670 1000 USD | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Jamaica or Uganda?
- Jamaica, at 1,284 1000 USD against 922.11 1000 USD in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Jamaica and Uganda?
- 361.89 1000 USD, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Uganda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Uganda rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Jamaica ranks 85th and Uganda ranks 88th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf