Jordan vs Portugal: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Jordan
- Portugal
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 3,174 1000 USD against 2,894 1000 USD in Portugal, a difference of 280 1000 USD.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Portugal ahead.
Jordan ranks 78th and Portugal ranks 79th of 190 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,290 1000 USD | 4,358 1000 USD | 3,068 1000 USD | Portugal |
| 2010s | 2,182 1000 USD | 6,273 1000 USD | 4,090 1000 USD | Portugal |
| 2020s | 3,310 1000 USD | 6,789 1000 USD | 3,480 1000 USD | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Jordan or Portugal?
- Jordan, at 3,174 1000 USD against 2,894 1000 USD in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Jordan and Portugal?
- 280 1000 USD, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Portugal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Portugal rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Jordan ranks 78th and Portugal ranks 79th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf