Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Kazakhstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 8,047 1000 USD against 7,103 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 944 1000 USD.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 65th and Namibia ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,071 1000 USD | 87.45 1000 USD | 983.79 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 2,580 1000 USD | 384.3 1000 USD | 2,196 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 8,680 1000 USD | 2,265 1000 USD | 6,415 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 8,047 1000 USD against 7,103 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 944 1000 USD, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 65th and Namibia ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf