Luxembourg vs Mali: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Luxembourg
- Mali
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 741.63 1000 USD against 635.78 1000 USD in Mali, a difference of 105.85 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 103rd and Mali ranks 106th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 422.43 1000 USD | 2,614 1000 USD | 2,191 1000 USD | Mali |
| 2010s | 1,039 1000 USD | 15,855 1000 USD | 14,816 1000 USD | Mali |
| 2020s | 983.87 1000 USD | 663 1000 USD | 320.87 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Luxembourg or Mali?
- Luxembourg, at 741.63 1000 USD against 635.78 1000 USD in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Luxembourg and Mali?
- 105.85 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mali?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Mali rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Luxembourg ranks 103rd and Mali ranks 106th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf