Luxembourg vs Mauritius: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Luxembourg
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 749.32 1000 USD against 741.63 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 7.69 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 103rd and Mauritius ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 479.04 1000 USD | 473.99 1000 USD | 5.05 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,187 1000 USD | 1,097 1000 USD | 90.37 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 983.87 1000 USD | 1,023 1000 USD | 39.04 1000 USD | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Luxembourg or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 749.32 1000 USD against 741.63 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 7.69 1000 USD, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mauritius?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Mauritius rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Luxembourg ranks 103rd and Mauritius ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf