Luxembourg vs Sweden: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Luxembourg
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 755.99 1000 USD against 741.63 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 14.36 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 103rd and Sweden ranks 101st of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 479.04 1000 USD | 1,498 1000 USD | 1,019 1000 USD | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1,187 1000 USD | 599.93 1000 USD | 587.16 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 983.87 1000 USD | 517.6 1000 USD | 466.27 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Luxembourg or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 755.99 1000 USD against 741.63 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 14.36 1000 USD, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Sweden rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Luxembourg ranks 103rd and Sweden ranks 101st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf