Mauritius vs State of Palestine: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Mauritius
- State of Palestine
How they compare
State of Palestine currently reports 775.32 1000 USD against 749.32 1000 USD in Mauritius, a difference of 26 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 94th and State of Palestine ranks 92nd of 177 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | State of Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,110 1000 USD | 597.72 1000 USD | 512.17 1000 USD | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 1,091 1000 USD | 723.4 1000 USD | 367.91 1000 USD | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Mauritius or State of Palestine?
- State of Palestine, at 775.32 1000 USD against 749.32 1000 USD in Mauritius as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Mauritius and State of Palestine?
- 26 1000 USD, with State of Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and State of Palestine?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and State of Palestine rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Mauritius ranks 94th and State of Palestine ranks 92nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf