Mexico vs New Zealand: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Mexico
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 42,090 1000 USD against 38,195 1000 USD in Mexico, a difference of 3,895 1000 USD.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Zealand ahead.
Mexico ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 190 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21,230 1000 USD | 17,852 1000 USD | 3,377 1000 USD | Mexico |
| 2010s | 38,248 1000 USD | 34,370 1000 USD | 3,877 1000 USD | Mexico |
| 2020s | 56,729 1000 USD | 47,487 1000 USD | 9,242 1000 USD | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Mexico or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 42,090 1000 USD against 38,195 1000 USD in Mexico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Mexico and New Zealand?
- 3,895 1000 USD, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and New Zealand?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Mexico and New Zealand rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Mexico ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 22nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf