Montenegro vs Togo: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Montenegro
- Togo
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 7.86 1000 USD against 5.58 1000 USD in Togo, a difference of 2.28 1000 USD.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.4 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Togo ahead.
Montenegro ranks 152nd and Togo ranks 155th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.04 1000 USD | 2,351 1000 USD | 2,351 1000 USD | Togo |
| 2010s | 3.87 1000 USD | 2,147 1000 USD | 2,143 1000 USD | Togo |
| 2020s | 22.86 1000 USD | 5.58 1000 USD | 17.28 1000 USD | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Montenegro or Togo?
- Montenegro, at 7.86 1000 USD against 5.58 1000 USD in Togo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Montenegro and Togo?
- 2.28 1000 USD, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Togo?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Montenegro and Togo rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Montenegro ranks 152nd and Togo ranks 155th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf