Nicaragua vs Slovakia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Nicaragua
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 16,579 1000 USD against 14,237 1000 USD in Nicaragua, a difference of 2,342 1000 USD.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 47th and Slovakia ranks 44th of 190 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,784 1000 USD | 5,199 1000 USD | 3,415 1000 USD | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 4,464 1000 USD | 11,987 1000 USD | 7,523 1000 USD | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 10,653 1000 USD | 15,845 1000 USD | 5,192 1000 USD | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Nicaragua or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 16,579 1000 USD against 14,237 1000 USD in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Nicaragua and Slovakia?
- 2,342 1000 USD, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Slovakia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Slovakia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Nicaragua ranks 47th and Slovakia ranks 44th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf