Nicaragua vs Sri Lanka: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Nicaragua
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 14,237 1000 USD against 13,893 1000 USD in Sri Lanka, a difference of 344 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 47th and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 190 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,784 1000 USD | 8,857 1000 USD | 7,073 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 4,464 1000 USD | 13,631 1000 USD | 9,167 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 10,653 1000 USD | 17,970 1000 USD | 7,316 1000 USD | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Nicaragua or Sri Lanka?
- Nicaragua, at 14,237 1000 USD against 13,893 1000 USD in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Nicaragua and Sri Lanka?
- 344 1000 USD, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sri Lanka?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Sri Lanka rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Nicaragua ranks 47th and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf