Poland vs Zimbabwe: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Poland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Poland currently reports 13,376 1000 USD against 12,213 1000 USD in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,163 1000 USD.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 177 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,518 1000 USD | 416.39 1000 USD | 3,101 1000 USD | Poland |
| 2010s | 10,123 1000 USD | 4,038 1000 USD | 6,085 1000 USD | Poland |
| 2020s | 26,791 1000 USD | 17,251 1000 USD | 9,539 1000 USD | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Poland or Zimbabwe?
- Poland, at 13,376 1000 USD against 12,213 1000 USD in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Poland and Zimbabwe?
- 1,163 1000 USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Zimbabwe rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Poland ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 50th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf