Rwanda vs Saint Lucia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Rwanda
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 0.3 1000 USD against 0.25 1000 USD in Rwanda, a difference of 0.05 1000 USD.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 163rd and Saint Lucia ranks 162nd of 177 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.48 1000 USD | 6.49 1000 USD | 0.9886 1000 USD | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 160.52 1000 USD | 2.96 1000 USD | 157.56 1000 USD | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 11.1 1000 USD | 0.3 1000 USD | 10.8 1000 USD | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Rwanda or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 0.3 1000 USD against 0.25 1000 USD in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Rwanda and Saint Lucia?
- 0.05 1000 USD, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saint Lucia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Rwanda and Saint Lucia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Rwanda ranks 163rd and Saint Lucia ranks 162nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf