Senegal vs Slovenia: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Senegal
- Slovenia
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 469.46 1000 USD against 375.24 1000 USD in Slovenia, a difference of 94.22 1000 USD.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.3 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Senegal ahead.
Senegal ranks 108th and Slovenia ranks 111th of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,122 1000 USD | 140.71 1000 USD | 981.32 1000 USD | Senegal |
| 2010s | 130.34 1000 USD | 377.08 1000 USD | 246.73 1000 USD | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 487.3 1000 USD | 2,244 1000 USD | 1,756 1000 USD | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Senegal or Slovenia?
- Senegal, at 469.46 1000 USD against 375.24 1000 USD in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Senegal and Slovenia?
- 94.22 1000 USD, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Slovenia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Senegal and Slovenia rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Senegal ranks 108th and Slovenia ranks 111th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf