Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Togo: Ammonium sulphate — Import value
Ammonium sulphate — Import value over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Togo
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 7.61 1000 USD against 5.58 1000 USD in Togo, a difference of 2.03 1000 USD.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.4 times Togo's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 153rd and Togo ranks 155th of 190 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.79 1000 USD | 2,351 1000 USD | 2,346 1000 USD | Togo |
| 2010s | 3.94 1000 USD | 1,705 1000 USD | 1,702 1000 USD | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonium sulphate — import value, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Togo?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 7.61 1000 USD against 5.58 1000 USD in Togo as of 2017.
- What is the difference in ammonium sulphate — import value between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo?
- 2.03 1000 USD, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo rank globally for ammonium sulphate — import value?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 153rd and Togo ranks 155th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonium sulphate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf