Croatia vs Finland: Animal waste — Energy consumption
Croatia
19.41 TJ
in 2024
Finland
92 TJ
in 2024
Croatia rank
21st
Finland rank
18th
Animal waste — Energy consumption over time
- Croatia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 92 TJ against 19.41 TJ in Croatia, a difference of 72.59 TJ.
That makes Finland's figure about 4.7 times Croatia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 21st and Finland ranks 18th of 23 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.79 TJ | 242.67 TJ | 226.88 TJ | Finland |
| 2020s | 28.59 TJ | 110.4 TJ | 81.81 TJ | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher animal waste — energy consumption, Croatia or Finland?
- Finland, at 92 TJ against 19.41 TJ in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in animal waste — energy consumption between Croatia and Finland?
- 72.59 TJ, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Finland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Finland rank globally for animal waste — energy consumption?
- Croatia ranks 21st and Finland ranks 18th of 23 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Animal waste — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.