Finland vs Philippines: Animal waste — Energy consumption
Animal waste — Energy consumption over time
- Finland
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 439.28 TJ against 92 TJ in Finland, a difference of 347.28 TJ.
That makes Philippines's figure about 4.8 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Philippines ahead.
Finland ranks 19th and Philippines ranks 16th of 24 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 208.1 TJ | 415.33 TJ | 207.23 TJ | Philippines |
| 2010s | 253.6 TJ | 530 TJ | 276.4 TJ | Philippines |
| 2020s | 110.4 TJ | 435.72 TJ | 325.32 TJ | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher animal waste — energy consumption, Finland or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 439.28 TJ against 92 TJ in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in animal waste — energy consumption between Finland and Philippines?
- 347.28 TJ, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Philippines?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Philippines rank globally for animal waste — energy consumption?
- Finland ranks 19th and Philippines ranks 16th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Animal waste — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.