Croatia vs Egypt: Annual afforestation
Croatia
80 hectares per year
in 2020
Egypt
30 hectares per year
in 2020
Croatia rank
59th
Egypt rank
61st
Annual afforestation over time
- Croatia
- Egypt
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 80 hectares per year against 30 hectares per year in Egypt, a difference of 50 hectares per year.
That makes Croatia's figure about 2.7 times Egypt's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 59th and Egypt ranks 61st of 106 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 270 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 270 hectares per year | Croatia |
| 2000s | 160 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 160 hectares per year | Croatia |
| 2010s | 110 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 110 hectares per year | Croatia |
| 2020s | 80 hectares per year | 30 hectares per year | 50 hectares per year | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual afforestation, Croatia or Egypt?
- Croatia, at 80 hectares per year against 30 hectares per year in Egypt as of 2020.
- What is the difference in annual afforestation between Croatia and Egypt?
- 50 hectares per year, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Egypt?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and Egypt rank globally for annual afforestation?
- Croatia ranks 59th and Egypt ranks 61st of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual afforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Afforestation is the establishment of forest through planting and/or deliberate seeding on land that, until then, was not classified as forest.