Ecuador vs Kuwait: Annual afforestation
Ecuador
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Kuwait
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Ecuador rank
67th
Kuwait rank
67th
Annual afforestation over time
- Ecuador
- Kuwait
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Kuwait, a difference of 0 hectares per year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 67th and Kuwait ranks 67th of 106 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,570 hectares per year | 140 hectares per year | 2,430 hectares per year | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 1,470 hectares per year | 140 hectares per year | 1,330 hectares per year | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 4,205 hectares per year | 90 hectares per year | 4,115 hectares per year | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual afforestation, Ecuador or Kuwait?
- Ecuador, at 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Kuwait as of 2020.
- What is the difference in annual afforestation between Ecuador and Kuwait?
- 0 hectares per year, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kuwait?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kuwait rank globally for annual afforestation?
- Ecuador ranks 67th and Kuwait ranks 67th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual afforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Afforestation is the establishment of forest through planting and/or deliberate seeding on land that, until then, was not classified as forest.