Equatorial Guinea vs Gambia: Annual afforestation
Equatorial Guinea
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Gambia
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Equatorial Guinea rank
67th
Gambia rank
67th
Annual afforestation over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Gambia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Gambia, a difference of 0 hectares per year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th and Gambia ranks 67th of 106 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual afforestation, Equatorial Guinea or Gambia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Gambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in annual afforestation between Equatorial Guinea and Gambia?
- 0 hectares per year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Gambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Gambia rank globally for annual afforestation?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 67th and Gambia ranks 67th of 106 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual afforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Afforestation is the establishment of forest through planting and/or deliberate seeding on land that, until then, was not classified as forest.