Cayman Islands vs Sweden: Annual change in forest area
Cayman Islands
0 hectares
in 2025
Sweden
0 hectares
in 2025
Cayman Islands rank
85th
Sweden rank
85th
Annual change in forest area over time
- Cayman Islands
- Sweden
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Sweden, a difference of 0 hectares.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sweden ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 85th and Sweden ranks 85th of 235 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -20 hectares | 10,000 hectares | 10,020 hectares | Sweden |
| 2000s | -20.9 hectares | -7,100 hectares | 7,079 hectares | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | -2.1 hectares | -13,880 hectares | 13,878 hectares | Cayman Islands |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | -1,533 hectares | 1,533 hectares | Cayman Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area, Cayman Islands or Sweden?
- Cayman Islands, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area between Cayman Islands and Sweden?
- 0 hectares, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Cayman Islands and Sweden rank globally for annual change in forest area?
- Cayman Islands ranks 85th and Sweden ranks 85th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.