Kiribati vs Pitcairn: Annual change in forest area
Kiribati
0 hectares
in 2025
Pitcairn
0 hectares
in 2025
Kiribati rank
85th
Pitcairn rank
85th
Annual change in forest area over time
- Kiribati
- Pitcairn
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Pitcairn, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Pitcairn has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 85th and Pitcairn ranks 85th of 235 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Pitcairn | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area, Kiribati or Pitcairn?
- Kiribati, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Pitcairn as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area between Kiribati and Pitcairn?
- 0 hectares, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Pitcairn?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Pitcairn rank globally for annual change in forest area?
- Kiribati ranks 85th and Pitcairn ranks 85th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.