Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Annual change in forest area
Mauritius
0 hectares
in 2025
New Caledonia
0 hectares
in 2025
Mauritius rank
85th
New Caledonia rank
85th
Annual change in forest area over time
- Mauritius
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 35 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 85th and New Caledonia ranks 85th of 235 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 86 hectares | 672 hectares | 586 hectares | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | -312.7 hectares | 172.5 hectares | 485.2 hectares | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | -42.5 hectares | 5,371 hectares | 5,413 hectares | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | -0.3333 hectares | 0 hectares | 0.3333 hectares | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area, Mauritius or New Caledonia?
- Mauritius, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in New Caledonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 0 hectares, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for annual change in forest area?
- Mauritius ranks 85th and New Caledonia ranks 85th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.