Saint Barthelemy vs Tokelau: Annual change in forest area
Saint Barthelemy
0 hectares
in 2025
Tokelau
0 hectares
in 2025
Saint Barthelemy rank
85th
Tokelau rank
85th
Annual change in forest area over time
- Saint Barthelemy
- Tokelau
How they compare
Saint Barthelemy currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tokelau, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Saint Barthelemy ranks 85th and Tokelau ranks 85th of 235 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Barthelemy | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in forest area, Saint Barthelemy or Tokelau?
- Saint Barthelemy, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Tokelau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in forest area between Saint Barthelemy and Tokelau?
- 0 hectares, with Saint Barthelemy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Barthelemy and Tokelau?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Saint Barthelemy and Tokelau rank globally for annual change in forest area?
- Saint Barthelemy ranks 85th and Tokelau ranks 85th of 235 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in forest area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net change in forest area measures forest expansion (the sum of afforestation and natural expansion) minus deforestation.