Nauru vs Russia: Annual deforestation
Nauru
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Russia
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Nauru rank
78th
Russia rank
78th
Annual deforestation over time
- Nauru
- Russia
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Russia, a difference of 0 hectares per year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Russia has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 78th and Russia ranks 78th of 112 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual deforestation, Nauru or Russia?
- Nauru, at 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Russia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in annual deforestation between Nauru and Russia?
- 0 hectares per year, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Russia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Nauru and Russia rank globally for annual deforestation?
- Nauru ranks 78th and Russia ranks 78th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual deforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.