Saudi Arabia vs Tokelau: Annual deforestation
Saudi Arabia
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Tokelau
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Saudi Arabia rank
78th
Tokelau rank
78th
Annual deforestation over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Tokelau
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Tokelau, a difference of 0 hectares per year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 78th and Tokelau ranks 78th of 112 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual deforestation, Saudi Arabia or Tokelau?
- Saudi Arabia, at 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Tokelau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in annual deforestation between Saudi Arabia and Tokelau?
- 0 hectares per year, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Tokelau?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Tokelau rank globally for annual deforestation?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 78th and Tokelau ranks 78th of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual deforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.