Greenland vs Tanzania: Annual forest expansion
Greenland
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Tanzania
0 hectares per year
in 2020
Greenland rank
73rd
Tanzania rank
73rd
Annual forest expansion over time
- Greenland
- Tanzania
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Tanzania, a difference of 0 hectares per year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Greenland ranks 73rd and Tanzania ranks 73rd of 110 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | 0 hectares per year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual forest expansion, Greenland or Tanzania?
- Greenland, at 0 hectares per year against 0 hectares per year in Tanzania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in annual forest expansion between Greenland and Tanzania?
- 0 hectares per year, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Greenland and Tanzania rank globally for annual forest expansion?
- Greenland ranks 73rd and Tanzania ranks 73rd of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual forest expansion. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest expansion is the sum of afforestation (the establishment of forest through planting and/or deliberate seeding) and natural forest expansion (expansion of forests through natural succession on land that, until then, was under another land use).