Africa Western and Central vs Zimbabwe: Aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate

Africa Western and Central
2.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
14.96 % change on previous year
in 2024
Africa Western and Central rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
27th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate over time

  • Africa Western and Central
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 14.96 % change on previous year against 2.01 % change on previous year in Africa Western and Central, a difference of 12.95 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 7.4 times Africa Western and Central's.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Africa Western and Central ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Africa Western and Central averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Africa Western and Central Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 4.69 % change on previous year 105.82 % change on previous year 101.14 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1980s 21.33 % change on previous year 9.64 % change on previous year 11.68 % change on previous year Africa Western and Central
1990s 8.88 % change on previous year 61.68 % change on previous year 52.8 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 21.41 % change on previous year 20.76 % change on previous year 0.6444 % change on previous year Africa Western and Central
2010s 8.99 % change on previous year 21.49 % change on previous year 12.5 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 3.21 % change on previous year -3.41 % change on previous year 6.62 % change on previous year Africa Western and Central

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate, Africa Western and Central or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 14.96 % change on previous year against 2.01 % change on previous year in Africa Western and Central as of 2024.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate between Africa Western and Central and Zimbabwe?
12.95 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Africa Western and Central and Zimbabwe?
52 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2024.
How do Africa Western and Central and Zimbabwe rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate?
Africa Western and Central ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Africa Western and Central vs Zimbabwe: Aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-annual-growth-rate/africa-western-and-central/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-annual-growth-rate/africa-western-and-central/zimbabwe/">Africa Western and Central vs Zimbabwe: Aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
248 places, 11,216 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Aquaculture production (metric tons). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.