Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Zambia: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.0007 metric tons per person
in 2024
Zambia
0.0042 metric tons per person
in 2024
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
41st
Zambia rank
41st

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Zambia
00.0010.0020.0030.004196019922024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0042 metric tons per person against 0.0007 metric tons per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.0035 metric tons per person.

That makes Zambia's figure about 5.7 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Zambia ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 41st and Zambia ranks 41st of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1970s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1980s 0 metric tons per person 0.0001 metric tons per person 0.0001 metric tons per person Zambia
1990s 0.0001 metric tons per person 0.0004 metric tons per person 0.0004 metric tons per person Zambia
2000s 0.0002 metric tons per person 0.0005 metric tons per person 0.0003 metric tons per person Zambia
2010s 0.0004 metric tons per person 0.0012 metric tons per person 0.0008 metric tons per person Zambia
2020s 0.0007 metric tons per person 0.0035 metric tons per person 0.0028 metric tons per person Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0042 metric tons per person against 0.0007 metric tons per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2024.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Zambia?
0.0035 metric tons per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Zambia?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Zambia rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 41st and Zambia ranks 41st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Zambia: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/zambia/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Zambia: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 16,000 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.