Low & middle income vs Solomon Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita

Low & middle income
0.0196 metric tons per person
in 2024
Solomon Islands
0.0372 metric tons per person
in 2024
Low & middle income rank
8th
Solomon Islands rank
10th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Solomon Islands
00.010.020.030.04196019922024

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0.0372 metric tons per person against 0.0196 metric tons per person in Low & middle income, a difference of 0.0176 metric tons per person.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.9 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Low & middle income ahead.

Low & middle income ranks 8th and Solomon Islands ranks 10th of 47 groups.

Low & middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0.0007 metric tons per person Low & middle income
1970s 0.0011 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0.0011 metric tons per person Low & middle income
1980s 0.0021 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0.0021 metric tons per person Low & middle income
1990s 0.0054 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0.0054 metric tons per person Low & middle income
2000s 0.0097 metric tons per person 0.0024 metric tons per person 0.0073 metric tons per person Low & middle income
2010s 0.0152 metric tons per person 0.0136 metric tons per person 0.0016 metric tons per person Low & middle income
2020s 0.0185 metric tons per person 0.017 metric tons per person 0.0015 metric tons per person Low & middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita, Low & middle income or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 0.0372 metric tons per person against 0.0196 metric tons per person in Low & middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita between Low & middle income and Solomon Islands?
0.0176 metric tons per person, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Solomon Islands?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Low & middle income and Solomon Islands rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita?
Low & middle income ranks 8th and Solomon Islands ranks 10th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Solomon Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-capita/low-and-middle-income/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-capita/low-and-middle-income/solomon-islands/">Low & middle income vs Solomon Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 16,000 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.