Afghanistan vs Canada: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Afghanistan
0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
136th
Canada rank
139th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Canada
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 136th and Canada ranks 139th of 216 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0074 metric tons per square kilometre 0.007 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0174 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0163 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.0081 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0199 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0118 metric tons per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre 0.019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0023 metric tons per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Canada?
Afghanistan, at 0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Canada?
0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Canada rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 136th and Canada ranks 139th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Canada: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/canada/">Afghanistan vs Canada: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.