Afghanistan vs Senegal: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Afghanistan
0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
0.0197 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
136th
Senegal rank
134th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Senegal
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 0.0197 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 136th and Senegal ranks 134th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 5 and Senegal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
1970s 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0006 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre Senegal
1980s 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Senegal
1990s 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
2000s 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 0.0081 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0046 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 0.0166 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0102 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0064 metric tons per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Senegal?
Senegal, at 0.0197 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Senegal?
0.0018 metric tons per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Senegal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Senegal rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 136th and Senegal ranks 134th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Senegal: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/senegal/">Afghanistan vs Senegal: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.