Albania vs Costa Rica: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Albania
0.3404 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.3225 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Albania rank
51st
Costa Rica rank
53rd

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Albania
  • Costa Rica
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Albania currently reports 0.3404 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3225 metric tons per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Albania's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Albania ranks 51st and Costa Rica ranks 53rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 3 and Costa Rica in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0031 metric tons per square kilometre Albania
1980s 0.0581 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0548 metric tons per square kilometre Albania
1990s 0.0299 metric tons per square kilometre 0.098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0681 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.0527 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4014 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3487 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.1505 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4893 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3388 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.3281 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3272 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Albania or Costa Rica?
Albania, at 0.3404 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3225 metric tons per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Albania and Costa Rica?
0.0179 metric tons per square kilometre, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Costa Rica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Albania and Costa Rica rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Albania ranks 51st and Costa Rica ranks 53rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Costa Rica: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/albania/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/albania/costa-rica/">Albania vs Costa Rica: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.