American Samoa vs Brazil: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

American Samoa
0.09 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil
0.0949 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
American Samoa rank
82nd
Brazil rank
80th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • American Samoa
  • Brazil
00.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0949 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.09 metric tons per square kilometre in American Samoa, a difference of 0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times American Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

American Samoa ranks 82nd and Brazil ranks 80th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, American Samoa averaged higher in 3 and Brazil in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade American Samoa Brazil Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0013 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.0225 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0071 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0154 metric tons per square kilometre American Samoa
2000s 0.0635 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0321 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0314 metric tons per square kilometre American Samoa
2010s 0.099 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0627 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0363 metric tons per square kilometre American Samoa
2020s 0.0825 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0842 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0017 metric tons per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, American Samoa or Brazil?
Brazil, at 0.0949 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.09 metric tons per square kilometre in American Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between American Samoa and Brazil?
0.0049 metric tons per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Brazil?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do American Samoa and Brazil rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
American Samoa ranks 82nd and Brazil ranks 80th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

American Samoa vs Brazil: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/american-samoa/brazil/">American Samoa vs Brazil: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.