Arab World vs Turkey: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Arab World
0.1376 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkey
0.7228 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Arab World rank
32nd
Turkey rank
31st

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Arab World
  • Turkey
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 0.7228 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1376 metric tons per square kilometre in Arab World, a difference of 0.5852 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Turkey's figure about 5.3 times Arab World's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Arab World ahead.

Arab World ranks 32nd and Turkey ranks 31st of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Arab World averaged higher in 3 and Turkey in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab World Turkey Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre Arab World
1970s 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre Arab World
1980s 0.0039 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0004 metric tons per square kilometre Arab World
1990s 0.0095 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0352 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0258 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey
2000s 0.0494 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1408 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0914 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey
2010s 0.1039 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3244 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2205 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey
2020s 0.1349 metric tons per square kilometre 0.638 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5031 metric tons per square kilometre Turkey

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Arab World or Turkey?
Turkey, at 0.7228 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1376 metric tons per square kilometre in Arab World as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Arab World and Turkey?
0.5852 metric tons per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab World and Turkey?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Arab World and Turkey rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Arab World ranks 32nd and Turkey ranks 31st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab World vs Turkey: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/arab-world/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/arab-world/turkiye/">Arab World vs Turkey: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.