Bhutan vs Puerto Rico: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Bhutan
0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
179th
Puerto Rico rank
178th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Puerto Rico
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Bhutan ranks 179th and Puerto Rico ranks 178th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0032 metric tons per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0156 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0149 metric tons per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 0.001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0299 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0289 metric tons per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.002 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.0034 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0021 metric tons per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 0.0012 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Puerto Rico?
0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Puerto Rico rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 179th and Puerto Rico ranks 178th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Puerto Rico: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/puerto-rico-us/">Bhutan vs Puerto Rico: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.