Bolivia vs Cote d'Ivoire: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Bolivia
0.0268 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire
0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
122nd
Cote d'Ivoire rank
121st

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Cote d'Ivoire
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0268 metric tons per square kilometre in Bolivia, a difference of 0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Bolivia ranks 122nd and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 121st of 216 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1980s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0003 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0033 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0026 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 0.0043 metric tons per square kilometre 0.012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0078 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 0.0196 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0233 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Cote d'Ivoire?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.0277 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0268 metric tons per square kilometre in Bolivia as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Cote d'Ivoire?
0.0009 metric tons per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Cote d'Ivoire?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 122nd and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 121st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Cote d'Ivoire: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/cote-d-ivoire/">Bolivia vs Cote d'Ivoire: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.