Cambodia vs OECD members: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Cambodia
1.78 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
0.27 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
20th
OECD members rank
17th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Cambodia
  • OECD members
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 1.78 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.27 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 1.51 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 6.6 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was OECD members ahead.

Cambodia ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 17th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 3 and OECD members in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia OECD members Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0285 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0285 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
1970s 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.055 metric tons per square kilometre 0.055 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
1980s 0.012 metric tons per square kilometre 0.092 metric tons per square kilometre 0.08 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
1990s 0.0554 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1293 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0739 metric tons per square kilometre OECD members
2000s 0.1837 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1731 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0106 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
2010s 0.8512 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2225 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6287 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 1.97 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2711 metric tons per square kilometre 1.7 metric tons per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Cambodia or OECD members?
Cambodia, at 1.78 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.27 metric tons per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Cambodia and OECD members?
1.51 metric tons per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and OECD members?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and OECD members rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Cambodia ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 17th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs OECD members: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/oecd-members/">Cambodia vs OECD members: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.