Chagai vs Faroe Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Chagai
5.78 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2021
Faroe Islands
71.8 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Chagai rank
1st
Faroe Islands rank
1st

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Chagai
  • Faroe Islands
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 71.8 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.78 metric tons per square kilometre in Chagai, a difference of 66.02 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 12.4 times Chagai's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Faroe Islands has been ahead every year.

Chagai ranks 1st and Faroe Islands ranks 1st of 1 regions.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chagai Faroe Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0514 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0514 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 0.0333 metric tons per square kilometre 1.72 metric tons per square kilometre 1.68 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 0.6303 metric tons per square kilometre 14.06 metric tons per square kilometre 13.43 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 3.54 metric tons per square kilometre 30.63 metric tons per square kilometre 27.09 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 6.51 metric tons per square kilometre 55.29 metric tons per square kilometre 48.78 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 5.69 metric tons per square kilometre 74.85 metric tons per square kilometre 69.16 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Chagai or Faroe Islands?
Faroe Islands, at 71.8 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.78 metric tons per square kilometre in Chagai as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Chagai and Faroe Islands?
66.02 metric tons per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Faroe Islands?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Chagai and Faroe Islands rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Chagai ranks 1st and Faroe Islands ranks 1st of 1 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chagai vs Faroe Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/channel-islands/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/channel-islands/faroe-islands/">Chagai vs Faroe Islands: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.