Chile vs Other small states: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Chile
2.02 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Other small states
0.3047 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
16th
Other small states rank
16th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Other small states
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 2.02 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3047 metric tons per square kilometre in Other small states, a difference of 1.72 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 6.6 times Other small states's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 16th and Other small states ranks 16th of 216 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Other small states Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0002 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0001 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0007 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.0183 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0024 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0159 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.2935 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0221 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2714 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.9559 metric tons per square kilometre 0.053 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9029 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.49 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1256 metric tons per square kilometre 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
2020s 2.01 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3055 metric tons per square kilometre 1.71 metric tons per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Chile or Other small states?
Chile, at 2.02 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.3047 metric tons per square kilometre in Other small states as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Chile and Other small states?
1.72 metric tons per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Other small states?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Other small states rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 16th and Other small states ranks 16th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Other small states: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/chile/other-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/chile/other-small-states/">Chile vs Other small states: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.