Channel Islands vs Ecuador: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Channel Islands
5.78 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2021
Ecuador
4.98 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Channel Islands rank
10th
Ecuador rank
12th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Channel Islands
  • Ecuador
02468196119922023

How they compare

Channel Islands currently reports 5.78 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.98 metric tons per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.8 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Channel Islands's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Channel Islands ranks 10th and Ecuador ranks 12th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Channel Islands averaged higher in 4 and Ecuador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Channel Islands Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0066 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.0333 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1469 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1136 metric tons per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.6303 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4088 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2215 metric tons per square kilometre Channel Islands
2000s 3.54 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5123 metric tons per square kilometre 3.03 metric tons per square kilometre Channel Islands
2010s 6.51 metric tons per square kilometre 1.71 metric tons per square kilometre 4.8 metric tons per square kilometre Channel Islands
2020s 5.69 metric tons per square kilometre 3.38 metric tons per square kilometre 2.31 metric tons per square kilometre Channel Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Channel Islands or Ecuador?
Channel Islands, at 5.78 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.98 metric tons per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2021.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Channel Islands and Ecuador?
0.8 metric tons per square kilometre, with Channel Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Channel Islands and Ecuador?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Channel Islands and Ecuador rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Channel Islands ranks 10th and Ecuador ranks 12th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Channel Islands vs Ecuador: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/chitral/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/chitral/ecuador/">Channel Islands vs Ecuador: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.