Croatia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Croatia
0.48 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.0378 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia rank
42nd
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
44th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Croatia
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.48 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0378 metric tons per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.4422 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Croatia's figure about 12.7 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 42nd and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th of 216 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0873 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0015 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0858 metric tons per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 0.2317 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0058 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2259 metric tons per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 0.2866 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0167 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2699 metric tons per square kilometre Croatia
2020s 0.4633 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0301 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4333 metric tons per square kilometre Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Croatia or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Croatia, at 0.48 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.0378 metric tons per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Croatia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
0.4422 metric tons per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Croatia ranks 42nd and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 44th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/croatia/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/croatia/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Croatia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.