Denmark vs High income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

Denmark
0.8284 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
High income
0.1849 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
29th
High income rank
28th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • High income
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0.8284 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1849 metric tons per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 4.5 times High income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 29th and High income ranks 28th of 216 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark High income Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2395 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0322 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2073 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 0.3415 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0621 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2794 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 0.6165 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1047 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5118 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 1.05 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1054 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9479 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 0.941 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1259 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8151 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 0.9218 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1574 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7645 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 0.9506 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1861 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7645 metric tons per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, Denmark or High income?
Denmark, at 0.8284 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1849 metric tons per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between Denmark and High income?
0.6435 metric tons per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and High income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and High income rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 29th and High income ranks 28th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs High income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/denmark/high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/denmark/high-income/">Denmark vs High income: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.