East Asia & Pacific vs Malta: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific
4.46 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
65.1 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
3rd
Malta rank
2nd

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Malta
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 65.1 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.46 metric tons per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 60.64 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 14.6 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Asia & Pacific ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 2nd of 47 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0847 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0847 metric tons per square kilometre East Asia & Pacific
1970s 0.1751 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1751 metric tons per square kilometre East Asia & Pacific
1980s 0.3811 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3811 metric tons per square kilometre East Asia & Pacific
1990s 1.01 metric tons per square kilometre 3.27 metric tons per square kilometre 2.26 metric tons per square kilometre Malta
2000s 1.99 metric tons per square kilometre 10.84 metric tons per square kilometre 8.85 metric tons per square kilometre Malta
2010s 3.43 metric tons per square kilometre 33.83 metric tons per square kilometre 30.4 metric tons per square kilometre Malta
2020s 4.26 metric tons per square kilometre 58.69 metric tons per square kilometre 54.43 metric tons per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific or Malta?
Malta, at 65.1 metric tons per square kilometre against 4.46 metric tons per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific and Malta?
60.64 metric tons per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Malta rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 3rd and Malta ranks 2nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Malta: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/malta/">East Asia & Pacific vs Malta: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.