El Salvador vs Ghana: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana
0.5103 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
36th
Ghana rank
38th

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Ghana
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5103 metric tons per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 0.1083 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ghana ahead.

El Salvador ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 38th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Ghana in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Ghana Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Ghana
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0008 metric tons per square kilometre Ghana
1980s 0.0177 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0016 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0161 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0037 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0213 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.1061 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0171 metric tons per square kilometre 0.089 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.3196 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1808 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1389 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.5654 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3973 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1681 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Ghana?
El Salvador, at 0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.5103 metric tons per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Ghana?
0.1083 metric tons per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Ghana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Ghana rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 38th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Ghana: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ghana/">El Salvador vs Ghana: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.