El Salvador vs IDA blend: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend
0.1354 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
36th
IDA blend rank
33rd

Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • IDA blend
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1354 metric tons per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 0.4832 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 4.6 times IDA blend's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was IDA blend ahead.

El Salvador ranks 36th and IDA blend ranks 33rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and IDA blend in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador IDA blend Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0011 metric tons per square kilometre IDA blend
1970s 0 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0019 metric tons per square kilometre IDA blend
1980s 0.0177 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0045 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0132 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.025 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0152 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.1061 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0362 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0699 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.3196 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1051 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2145 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.5654 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1275 metric tons per square kilometre 0.438 metric tons per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre, El Salvador or IDA blend?
El Salvador, at 0.6186 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.1354 metric tons per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre between El Salvador and IDA blend?
0.4832 metric tons per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and IDA blend?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and IDA blend rank globally for aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 36th and IDA blend ranks 33rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs IDA blend: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/aquaculture-production-metric-tons-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/ida-blend/">El Salvador vs IDA blend: Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Aquaculture production (metric tons), per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
264 places, 15,328 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Aquaculture production (metric tons) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.